Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wiki Structuring Project"

From Armagetron
Line 23: Line 23:
 
***Not just that template: <code><nowiki>[[Talk:Wiki Structuring Project]]</nowiki></code> → [[Talk:Wiki Structuring Project]] —[[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 17:58, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
 
***Not just that template: <code><nowiki>[[Talk:Wiki Structuring Project]]</nowiki></code> → [[Talk:Wiki Structuring Project]] —[[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 17:58, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
 
***heh i was wondering why editing links wasnt working about a minute or so before you posted that--[[User:Your mom|Your mom]] 18:26, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
 
***heh i was wondering why editing links wasnt working about a minute or so before you posted that--[[User:Your mom|Your mom]] 18:26, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
 +
**You cant link to catagories inside of a table so i guess this wont be happaning unless im doing something wrong...Mabey redirect pages idk--[[User:Your mom|Your mom]] 21:23, 1 September 2006 (CDT)
 +
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightgrey; color:white" align="center"
 +
|[[Category:Getting_Started]] || [[rubber]] || first cell should be a link to a catagory then rubber(second) then this(3rd)
 +
|}
  
 
===Catagories===
 
===Catagories===
 
A good way to organize
 
A good way to organize

Revision as of 22:23, 1 September 2006

Templates

Playing the game Server administration Extending armagetron advanced Development docs
getting started program docs game concepts stratagies and tactics
lag rubber grinding fps

I propose we use templates like this to help organize Anyone else have any better ideas for formating templates like this,in other words a beter way to format and make these kind of wiki/html tables look nice?--Your mom 18:58, 28 August 2006 (CDT)

  • What you've got (only cleaned up and made to look really freaking nice), category breadcrumb moved to the top, or this: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/MenuTabs --Lucifer 19:33, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
  • Im all for the menutab idea if we could get that working --Your mom 21:03, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
    • Well, I installed it but didn't manage to get it working well. Fool with it if you like and see if you can make sense out of it. --Lucifer 07:58, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
      • <!-- Bad Behavior 2.0.4 run time: 20.731 ms -->
        <div id="header">
        <ul id="primary">
        <!-- Bad Behavior 2.0.4 run time: 20.731 ms -->
        <li>X&lt;/li&gt;
        <li>Y&lt;/li&gt;
        <li>Z&lt;/li&gt;
        <ul id="secondary">
        <!-- Bad Behavior 2.0.4 run time: 20.731 ms -->
        <li>A&lt;/li&gt;
        <li>B&lt;/li&gt;
        <li>C&lt;/li&gt;
        </ul>
        </ul>
        </div>

        It's simply broken in a weird way, and I can't help but notice that BB repeats itself too often. Bad behavior indeed. —Jonathan 10:27, 29 August 2006 (CDT)

        • That's new, probably fallout from the upgrade. Bad Behavior didn't used to repeat itself. Hmmm.... Maybe Bad Behavior hasn't been completely updated to 1.7 and I should check for a new version... --Lucifer 13:32, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
        • 2 things. :) There isn't an updated Bad Behavior extension, i.e. there's one extension that's supposed to work for all supported MediaWiki versions. The second is that I looked at the bad behavior log and it's definitely working, that is, unless you like mexican internet pharmacies and find them to be ontopic on this wiki, heh. A patch that fixes this weird behavior of Bad Behavior would be welcome, but I looked at the extension itself and it'll probably take a bit to fix, like maybe a real knowledge of how extensions in MediaWiki work. --Lucifer 13:47, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
    • One more thing before I go to class. We have the Sections template already, which for some reason or other prints the current page as bold instead of a link. It's just a list with simple formatting, we could start with some templates that go under it and just work on those incrementally until we wind up with something like Your_mom suggests. --Lucifer 13:54, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
      • Not just that template: [[Talk:Wiki Structuring Project]]Talk:Wiki Structuring ProjectJonathan 17:58, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
      • heh i was wondering why editing links wasnt working about a minute or so before you posted that--Your mom 18:26, 29 August 2006 (CDT)
    • You cant link to catagories inside of a table so i guess this wont be happaning unless im doing something wrong...Mabey redirect pages idk--Your mom 21:23, 1 September 2006 (CDT)
rubber first cell should be a link to a catagory then rubber(second) then this(3rd)

Catagories

A good way to organize