Armagetronad Advanced talk:Policy - Revision history

Lucifer at 10:01, 10 March 2007

2007-03-10T10:01:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 10 March 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)		*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)
	**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)		**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)

	** Actually, there is a point, and the spam huntress girl recommends doing it for standard pages you don't normally use. Bots that target those pages frequently won't go somewhere else, so overall spam is reduced. Of course, bots that are hitting those pages as targets of opportunity will hit other pages instead. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 04:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)		** Actually, there is a point, and the spam huntress girl recommends doing it for standard pages you don't normally use. Bots that target those pages frequently won't go somewhere else, so overall spam is reduced. Of course, bots that are hitting those pages as targets of opportunity will hit other pages instead. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 04:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Lucifer at 10:00, 10 March 2007

2007-03-10T10:00:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:00, 10 March 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)		*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)
	**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)		**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)

			** Actually, there is a point, and the spam huntress girl recommends doing it for standard pages you don't normally use. Bots that target those pages frequently won't go somewhere else, so overall spam is reduced. Of course, bots that are hitting those pages as targets of opportunity will hit other pages instead. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 04:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Jonathan: I'll unprotect Category talk:Fortress Tactics (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know.

2007-03-10T09:35:10Z

I'll unprotect Category talk:Fortress Tactics (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 10 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST)		If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST)
	*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)		*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)
			**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Wrtlprnft: point in protecting talk pages?

2007-03-10T07:54:16Z

point in protecting talk pages?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:54, 10 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST)		If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST)
			*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Lucifer at 04:24, 10 March 2007

2007-03-10T04:24:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 10 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Protecting page, 21 deleted spam posts.		Protecting page, 21 deleted spam posts.

			If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST)

Your mom: Protected "Armagetron Advanced Wiki talk:Policy": 21 deleted spam edits. Protecting page. [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

2007-03-10T04:22:38Z

Protected "Armagetron Advanced Wiki talk:Policy": 21 deleted spam edits. Protecting page. [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:22, 10 March 2007
(No difference)

Your mom: Protecting frequently spammed pages

2007-03-10T04:22:20Z

Protecting frequently spammed pages

New page

Protecting page, 21 deleted spam posts.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 10 March 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)		*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)
	**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)		**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)

	** Actually, there is a point, and the spam huntress girl recommends doing it for standard pages you don't normally use. Bots that target those pages frequently won't go somewhere else, so overall spam is reduced. Of course, bots that are hitting those pages as targets of opportunity will hit other pages instead. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 04:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)		** Actually, there is a point, and the spam huntress girl recommends doing it for standard pages you don't normally use. Bots that target those pages frequently won't go somewhere else, so overall spam is reduced. Of course, bots that are hitting those pages as targets of opportunity will hit other pages instead. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 04:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:00, 10 March 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)		*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)
	**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)		**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)

			** Actually, there is a point, and the spam huntress girl recommends doing it for standard pages you don't normally use. Bots that target those pages frequently won't go somewhere else, so overall spam is reduced. Of course, bots that are hitting those pages as targets of opportunity will hit other pages instead. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 04:00, 10 March 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 10 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST)		If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer\|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST)
	*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)		*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)
			**I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan\|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)