Fortress winzone discussion - Revision history

Cadillac at 03:15, 28 August 2021

2021-08-28T03:15:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 27 August 2021
Line 23:		Line 23:
	** I think the offensive team should get the advantage because they played better in the round (by killing everyone except the opposite defender before the other team did), but i agree 10 points is a bit too much. Would it be possible to have a smaller bonus for hitting the winzone? like maybe 5 or even less? Then the attacker(s) could also choose to go for the big bucks or be chicken and go for the smaller amount of points.--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 04:58, 16 July 2006 (CDT)		** I think the offensive team should get the advantage because they played better in the round (by killing everyone except the opposite defender before the other team did), but i agree 10 points is a bit too much. Would it be possible to have a smaller bonus for hitting the winzone? like maybe 5 or even less? Then the attacker(s) could also choose to go for the big bucks or be chicken and go for the smaller amount of points.--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 04:58, 16 July 2006 (CDT)

	[[Category:~~Tournaments~~]]		[[Category:TRONIC]]

Cadillac at 15:53, 23 August 2021

2021-08-23T15:53:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 23 August 2021
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* ¡LØL! - Durka - There should be an expanding deathzone instead of the winzone. The winzone comes out after a long time and mostly the team that is on offense can easily get 10 points. This is unfair for the defensive team at the time as they might have a good chance of winning the round. Expanding deathzone should be best.		* ¡LØL! - Durka - There should be an expanding deathzone instead of the winzone. The winzone comes out after a long time and mostly the team that is on offense can easily get 10 points. This is unfair for the defensive team at the time as they might have a good chance of winning the round. Expanding deathzone should be best.
	** I think the offensive team should get the advantage because they played better in the round (by killing everyone except the opposite defender before the other team did), but i agree 10 points is a bit too much. Would it be possible to have a smaller bonus for hitting the winzone? like maybe 5 or even less? Then the attacker(s) could also choose to go for the big bucks or be chicken and go for the smaller amount of points.--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 04:58, 16 July 2006 (CDT)		** I think the offensive team should get the advantage because they played better in the round (by killing everyone except the opposite defender before the other team did), but i agree 10 points is a bit too much. Would it be possible to have a smaller bonus for hitting the winzone? like maybe 5 or even less? Then the attacker(s) could also choose to go for the big bucks or be chicken and go for the smaller amount of points.--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 04:58, 16 July 2006 (CDT)

			[[Category:Tournaments]]

Lackadaisical at 09:58, 16 July 2006

2006-07-16T09:58:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:58, 16 July 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:

	* ¡LØL! - Durka - There should be an expanding deathzone instead of the winzone. The winzone comes out after a long time and mostly the team that is on offense can easily get 10 points. This is unfair for the defensive team at the time as they might have a good chance of winning the round. Expanding deathzone should be best.		* ¡LØL! - Durka - There should be an expanding deathzone instead of the winzone. The winzone comes out after a long time and mostly the team that is on offense can easily get 10 points. This is unfair for the defensive team at the time as they might have a good chance of winning the round. Expanding deathzone should be best.
			** I think the offensive team should get the advantage because they played better in the round (by killing everyone except the opposite defender before the other team did), but i agree 10 points is a bit too much. Would it be possible to have a smaller bonus for hitting the winzone? like maybe 5 or even less? Then the attacker(s) could also choose to go for the big bucks or be chicken and go for the smaller amount of points.--[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 04:58, 16 July 2006 (CDT)

Manta at 02:32, 16 July 2006

2006-07-16T02:32:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 15 July 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:


	* Wraith Squadron - Manta -		* Wraith Squadron - Manta - I second Durka's statment, We already know an expanding deathzone works very well on the CT server. If we even agree to have a zone that is.

Joda: added menu template

2006-06-20T18:39:45Z

added menu template

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 20 June 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{LadleOrg}}
	The biggest discussion so far is whether or not there should be a winzone or a deathzone. Team captains please colaborate with your teams as to what you think it should be. Post your comments below.		The biggest discussion so far is whether or not there should be a winzone or a deathzone. Team captains please colaborate with your teams as to what you think it should be. Post your comments below.

Durka at 19:22, 19 June 2006

2006-06-19T19:22:59Z

New page

The biggest discussion so far is whether or not there should be a winzone or a deathzone. Team captains please colaborate with your teams as to what you think it should be. Post your comments below.

* Anarchic Wanderers -

* Speeders -

* Hg Merkurium -

* Fortress Elite -

* Wraith Squadron - Manta -

* Crazy Tronners -

* ¡LØL! - Durka - There should be an expanding deathzone instead of the winzone. The winzone comes out after a long time and mostly the team that is on offense can easily get 10 points. This is unfair for the defensive team at the time as they might have a good chance of winning the round. Expanding deathzone should be best.