Ladle-9/Results - Revision history

Cadillac at 02:25, 28 August 2021

2021-08-28T02:25:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 27 August 2021
Line 206:		Line 206:
	{{Ladle-7}}		{{Ladle-7}}

	~~[[Category:Tournaments]]~~
	~~[[Category:Tournaments/Fort]]~~
	[[Category:Ladle]]		[[Category:Ladle]]

Cadillac at 18:42, 23 August 2021

2021-08-23T18:42:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 23 August 2021
Line 205:		Line 205:

	{{Ladle-7}}		{{Ladle-7}}

			[[Category:Tournaments]]
			[[Category:Tournaments/Fort]]
			[[Category:Ladle]]

64.118.125.30 at 01:24, 6 March 2007

2007-03-06T01:24:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:24, 5 March 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*yes... perhaps the winzone is necessary for nonfinal rounds... in order for the timing to remain within the realms of feasibility --16:05, 4 March 2007 (CST)		*yes... perhaps the winzone is necessary for nonfinal rounds... in order for the timing to remain within the realms of feasibility --16:05, 4 March 2007 (CST)
	*MaZuffeR pointed out that we could also get rid of shrink. Although a while ago I wouln't agree with that, it seems a good possibility now --[[User:Madmax\|madmax]] 17:14, 4 March 2007 (CST)		*MaZuffeR pointed out that we could also get rid of shrink. Although a while ago I wouln't agree with that, it seems a good possibility now --[[User:Madmax\|madmax]] 17:14, 4 March 2007 (CST)
	*Having a win zone is the same as granting an automatic win the attacking team and encourages camping. However an expanding death-zone has been working great for a long time on CT's servers, The players still have to fight it out to the biter end with the player with the best skills being the winner, probably should still have a large LAST_DEATH setting though. --Manta		*Personally I prefer the long fights. Having a win zone is the same as granting an automatic win to the attacking team and encourages camping. However an expanding death-zone has been working great for a long time on CT's servers, The players still have to fight it out to the biter end with the player with the best skills being the winner, probably should still have a large LAST_DEATH setting though. --Manta
	*Problem: A growing deathzone tends to interrupt interesting fights, at least I had that experience a couple of times. It also tends to lead to pointless camping in different edges of the map to see who can survive the longest. A winzone just doesn't get used or if it does people get angry at the one who enters it for no real reason…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:52, 5 March 2007 (CST)		*Problem: A growing deathzone tends to interrupt interesting fights, at least I had that experience a couple of times. It also tends to lead to pointless camping in different edges of the map to see who can survive the longest. A winzone just doesn't get used or if it does people get angry at the one who enters it for no real reason…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:52, 5 March 2007 (CST)
	*Crazy idea: Zones who move to the enemy when it's 1v1, could make for some interesting fights. More interesting than a closed def and someone either waiting for a gap or pushing it millimeter by millimeter. --[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 06:06, 5 March 2007 (CST)		*Crazy idea: Zones who move to the enemy when it's 1v1, could make for some interesting fights. More interesting than a closed def and someone either waiting for a gap or pushing it millimeter by millimeter. --[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 06:06, 5 March 2007 (CST)

64.118.125.30: /* Feedback for the Ninth Ladle */

2007-03-06T01:19:33Z

Feedback for the Ninth Ladle

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 5 March 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*yes... perhaps the winzone is necessary for nonfinal rounds... in order for the timing to remain within the realms of feasibility --16:05, 4 March 2007 (CST)		*yes... perhaps the winzone is necessary for nonfinal rounds... in order for the timing to remain within the realms of feasibility --16:05, 4 March 2007 (CST)
	*MaZuffeR pointed out that we could also get rid of shrink. Although a while ago I wouln't agree with that, it seems a good possibility now --[[User:Madmax\|madmax]] 17:14, 4 March 2007 (CST)		*MaZuffeR pointed out that we could also get rid of shrink. Although a while ago I wouln't agree with that, it seems a good possibility now --[[User:Madmax\|madmax]] 17:14, 4 March 2007 (CST)
	*An expanding death-zone has been working great for a long time on CT's servers, The players still have to fight it out to the biter end with the best ~~player~~ being the winner, probably should still have a large LAST_DEATH setting though. --Manta		*Having a win zone is the same as granting an automatic win the attacking team and encourages camping. However an expanding death-zone has been working great for a long time on CT's servers, The players still have to fight it out to the biter end with the player with the best skills being the winner, probably should still have a large LAST_DEATH setting though. --Manta
	*Problem: A growing deathzone tends to interrupt interesting fights, at least I had that experience a couple of times. It also tends to lead to pointless camping in different edges of the map to see who can survive the longest. A winzone just doesn't get used or if it does people get angry at the one who enters it for no real reason…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:52, 5 March 2007 (CST)		*Problem: A growing deathzone tends to interrupt interesting fights, at least I had that experience a couple of times. It also tends to lead to pointless camping in different edges of the map to see who can survive the longest. A winzone just doesn't get used or if it does people get angry at the one who enters it for no real reason…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:52, 5 March 2007 (CST)
	*Crazy idea: Zones who move to the enemy when it's 1v1, could make for some interesting fights. More interesting than a closed def and someone either waiting for a gap or pushing it millimeter by millimeter. --[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 06:06, 5 March 2007 (CST)		*Crazy idea: Zones who move to the enemy when it's 1v1, could make for some interesting fights. More interesting than a closed def and someone either waiting for a gap or pushing it millimeter by millimeter. --[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 06:06, 5 March 2007 (CST)

84.161.138.14: /* Feedback for the Ninth Ladle */

2007-03-05T19:14:26Z

Feedback for the Ninth Ladle

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 5 March 2007
Line 38:		Line 38:
	:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.		:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.
	;fr34k		;fr34k
	:First of all grats to Team SS, nice matches and huge def :). Ah and TuI, our matches were very close, but anyways you won. The only problem i'm worrying about is, why we had a winzone in the first match, but ~~not~~ in the 2nd ~~and~~ in the 3rd (yes i know, Z-Man disabled it after the first, but some ppl voted for, some against and some just didnt read it). I was also wondering myself, why the Winzone always spawned by the blue team's def (my team was gold :P) and not in the middle of the Fortress map. GM & GZ, TheFreakZ		:First of all grats to Team SS, nice matches and huge def :). Ah and TuI, our matches were very close, but anyways you won. The only problem i'm worrying about is, why we had a winzone in the first match, but neither in the 2nd nor in the 3rd (yes i know, Z-Man disabled it after the first, but some ppl voted for, some against and some just didnt read it). I was also wondering myself, why the Winzone always spawned by the blue team's def (my team was gold :P) and not in the middle of the Fortress map. GM & GZ, TheFreakZ

	== Previous Winners ==		== Previous Winners ==

84.161.138.14: /* Feedback for the Ninth Ladle */

2007-03-05T19:13:38Z

Feedback for the Ninth Ladle

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 5 March 2007
Line 37:		Line 37:
	;G5		;G5
	:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.		:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.
			;fr34k
			:First of all grats to Team SS, nice matches and huge def :). Ah and TuI, our matches were very close, but anyways you won. The only problem i'm worrying about is, why we had a winzone in the first match, but not in the 2nd and in the 3rd (yes i know, Z-Man disabled it after the first, but some ppl voted for, some against and some just didnt read it). I was also wondering myself, why the Winzone always spawned by the blue team's def (my team was gold :P) and not in the middle of the Fortress map. GM & GZ, TheFreakZ

	== Previous Winners ==		== Previous Winners ==

141.215.5.44: /* Feedback for the Ninth Ladle */

2007-03-05T15:37:19Z

Feedback for the Ninth Ladle

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 5 March 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:
	:congrats to team ss & well played to the rest of the participants, lets make the next ladle a even better one! :) (with hopefully sp winning it :) )		:congrats to team ss & well played to the rest of the participants, lets make the next ladle a even better one! :) (with hopefully sp winning it :) )
	* If you don't think shrink isn't very high, removing it won't be a problem for you ;). I think defending is too easy as it is now. There isn't many settings that can be changed to make the game more balanced without affecting other aspects of the game too much, but shrink is definitely one of them. --[[User:MaZuffeR\|MaZuffeR]] 05:09, 5 March 2007 (CST)		* If you don't think shrink isn't very high, removing it won't be a problem for you ;). I think defending is too easy as it is now. There isn't many settings that can be changed to make the game more balanced without affecting other aspects of the game too much, but shrink is definitely one of them. --[[User:MaZuffeR\|MaZuffeR]] 05:09, 5 March 2007 (CST)
			* I agree that it has become a very defensive game..I remember early on when you could go on streaks of just owning a defender lol :P Defense has gotten a lot better but there's only so much an offense can do you know. Maybe increase the zone size to be able to cover it barely by the full wall length. Then if you slip up just a little bit then you won't cover the whole zone. However now that I think about it, that would not be good for any defense other than "THE SQUARE" lol..because imagine skip's defense if the zone was bigger...he would only be able to get 75% around just cuz he does so many angles in it. Just an idea to throw out there
	;G5		;G5
	:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.		:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.

Lackadaisical: /* Feedback for the Ninth Ladle */

2007-03-05T12:06:14Z

Feedback for the Ninth Ladle

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:06, 5 March 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*An expanding death-zone has been working great for a long time on CT's servers, The players still have to fight it out to the biter end with the best player being the winner, probably should still have a large LAST_DEATH setting though. --Manta		*An expanding death-zone has been working great for a long time on CT's servers, The players still have to fight it out to the biter end with the best player being the winner, probably should still have a large LAST_DEATH setting though. --Manta
	*Problem: A growing deathzone tends to interrupt interesting fights, at least I had that experience a couple of times. It also tends to lead to pointless camping in different edges of the map to see who can survive the longest. A winzone just doesn't get used or if it does people get angry at the one who enters it for no real reason…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:52, 5 March 2007 (CST)		*Problem: A growing deathzone tends to interrupt interesting fights, at least I had that experience a couple of times. It also tends to lead to pointless camping in different edges of the map to see who can survive the longest. A winzone just doesn't get used or if it does people get angry at the one who enters it for no real reason…—[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 01:52, 5 March 2007 (CST)
			*Crazy idea: Zones who move to the enemy when it's 1v1, could make for some interesting fights. More interesting than a closed def and someone either waiting for a gap or pushing it millimeter by millimeter. --[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]] 06:06, 5 March 2007 (CST)

	;Rico		;Rico
Line 25:		Line 26:
	;[[User:Durka\|Durka]]		;[[User:Durka\|Durka]]
	:If Wild West isn't used as one of the servers in the next Ladle, then this whole concept isn't fair and then makes it meaningless for us to play. Have we '''ever''' played in an American server in any of the past '''9''' Ladles? No. This isn't fair to us and we're not enjoying this at all. Especially us on the West Coast.		:If Wild West isn't used as one of the servers in the next Ladle, then this whole concept isn't fair and then makes it meaningless for us to play. Have we '''ever''' played in an American server in any of the past '''9''' Ladles? No. This isn't fair to us and we're not enjoying this at all. Especially us on the West Coast.
			;[[User:Lackadaisical\|Lackadaisical]]
			:Minor detail, but I can remember at least 1 game where I played on an American server, I think it was AW-B vs WPN in the third ladle.
	;k3nNy		;k3nNy
	:the main problem of the chatting stuff was that tui immediately (as usually) started to get upset some sps joining the server, without even saying much (and kickin some of them --> psyko). although i agree that some sps were talking too much. my idea concerning that problem: maybe a spectator chat or sth like that could be introduced? ppl joining the server could ask in spec chat then what the standings are eg.		:the main problem of the chatting stuff was that tui immediately (as usually) started to get upset some sps joining the server, without even saying much (and kickin some of them --> psyko). although i agree that some sps were talking too much. my idea concerning that problem: maybe a spectator chat or sth like that could be introduced? ppl joining the server could ask in spec chat then what the standings are eg.

MaZuffeR: /* Feedback for the Ninth Ladle */

2007-03-05T11:09:19Z

Feedback for the Ninth Ladle

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:09, 5 March 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:concerning shrink: i dont think we need to get rid of it. it isnt very high (at least at cafe?) anyway?		:concerning shrink: i dont think we need to get rid of it. it isnt very high (at least at cafe?) anyway?
	:congrats to team ss & well played to the rest of the participants, lets make the next ladle a even better one! :) (with hopefully sp winning it :) )		:congrats to team ss & well played to the rest of the participants, lets make the next ladle a even better one! :) (with hopefully sp winning it :) )
			* If you don't think shrink isn't very high, removing it won't be a problem for you ;). I think defending is too easy as it is now. There isn't many settings that can be changed to make the game more balanced without affecting other aspects of the game too much, but shrink is definitely one of them. --[[User:MaZuffeR\|MaZuffeR]] 05:09, 5 March 2007 (CST)
	;G5		;G5
	:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.		:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.

G5: /* Feedback for the Ninth Ladle */

2007-03-05T11:00:24Z

Feedback for the Ninth Ladle

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 5 March 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:concerning shrink: i dont think we need to get rid of it. it isnt very high (at least at cafe?) anyway?		:concerning shrink: i dont think we need to get rid of it. it isnt very high (at least at cafe?) anyway?
	:congrats to team ss & well played to the rest of the participants, lets make the next ladle a even better one! :) (with hopefully sp winning it :) )		:congrats to team ss & well played to the rest of the participants, lets make the next ladle a even better one! :) (with hopefully sp winning it :) )
			;G5
			:Again, my team (TM) lost in the first round. Have I ever been in a second round? Don't think so. But for the first time it was fun to play. We lost because the others (SP) were better -- a little better. But we didn't loose because we paniced or fu**ed it up. That I like. Madmax showed great fights as defender in match 2 and 3. But thanks to everyone in TM.

	== Previous Winners ==		== Previous Winners ==