Talk:Crosseyed & Painless Tournament - Revision history

Word at 13:11, 10 March 2010

2010-03-10T13:11:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 10 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	---- Word -----------------------------------------------------		---- Word -----------------------------------------------------
	LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.		LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.
	Atm it's ~~four~~ players per team ~~but that can~~ be very laggy. ~~Perhaps~~ we~~'ll~~ change it to 3 players.		Atm it's three players per team now so it won't be very laggy. I don't think we should change it to 4 players, but it's possible.

	In the finals it's still best of 5 but there's only one winner in the end.		In the finals it's still best of 5 but there's only one winner in the end.

	Thoughts?		Thoughts?

Word at 12:29, 10 March 2010

2010-03-10T12:29:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 10 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:

	---- Word -----------------------------------------------------		---- Word -----------------------------------------------------
	LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.		LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.
Line 7:		Line 6:

	Thoughts?		Thoughts?
	~~---------------------------------------------------------------~~

Word at 12:28, 10 March 2010

2010-03-10T12:28:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 10 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:

			---- Word -----------------------------------------------------
	LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.		LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.
	Atm it's four players per team but that can be very laggy. Perhaps we'll change it to 3 players.		Atm it's four players per team but that can be very laggy. Perhaps we'll change it to 3 players.
Line 5:		Line 7:

	Thoughts?		Thoughts?
			---------------------------------------------------------------

Word at 22:40, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T22:40:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 9 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.		LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.
	Atm it's four players per team but that can be very laggy. ~~Maybe~~ we'll change it to 3 players.~~..but then again we might not be able to host enough servers~~		Atm it's four players per team but that can be very laggy. Perhaps we'll change it to 3 players.

	In the finals it's still best of 5 but there's only one winner in the end.		In the finals it's still best of 5 but there's only one winner in the end.

	Thoughts?		Thoughts?

Word at 22:39, 9 March 2010

2010-03-09T22:39:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 9 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.		LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.
			Atm it's four players per team but that can be very laggy. Maybe we'll change it to 3 players...but then again we might not be able to host enough servers

	In the finals it's still best of 5 but there's only one winner in the end.		In the finals it's still best of 5 but there's only one winner in the end.

	Thoughts?		Thoughts?

Word: New page: LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next r...

2010-03-09T22:33:57Z

New page: LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next r...

New page

LIMIT_SCORE is 50 and since there are always 4 teams the rounds should be over fast. There are always four teams, so in my opinion the best two teams after 5 matches qualify for the next round, but they won't play against each other again until the finals.
In the finals it's still best of 5 but there's only one winner in the end.
Thoughts?