Difference between revisions of "Armagetron talk:Policy"
From Armagetron
(point in protecting talk pages?) |
(I'll unprotect Category talk:Fortress Tactics (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST) | If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --[[User:Lucifer|Lucifer]] 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST) | ||
*/me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST) | */me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—[[User:Wrtlprnft|Wrtlprnft]] 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | **I'll unprotect [[Category talk:Fortress Tactics]] (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —[[User:Jonathan|Jonathan]] 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 05:35, 10 March 2007
Protecting page, 21 deleted spam posts.
If I delete this page, it will no longer be protected. --Lucifer 22:24, 9 March 2007 (CST)
- /me wonders if protecting frequently spammed pages actually does anything besides removing the point in talk pages. The spam will just go somewhere else, possibly where it's even more annoying…—Wrtlprnft 01:54, 10 March 2007 (CST)
- I'll unprotect Category talk:Fortress Tactics (the second-oldest in the last 30 days) to see if the spam comes back. Could be useful to know. —Jonathan 03:35, 10 March 2007 (CST)
