Difference between revisions of "Ladle/Guidelines/Voting"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{| border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" rules="all" style="margin:1em 1em 1em 0; border:solid 1px #000000; border-collapse:collapse; font-size:95%; empty-cells:show; text-align:left;" | {| border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" rules="all" style="margin:1em 1em 1em 0; border:solid 1px #000000; border-collapse:collapse; font-size:95%; empty-cells:show; text-align:left;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! Ladle !! Issue !! Result | + | ! Ladle !! Issue !! Choices !! Result |
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="4" | [http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtopic.php?p=199514#p199514 L-16] | | rowspan="4" | [http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtopic.php?p=199514#p199514 L-16] | ||
| − | | score_hole (1 point, 0 points) | + | | score_hole |
| + | | (1 point, 0 points) | ||
| 0 points | | 0 points | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 2v2 Fortress Conquering (conquerable, unconquerable) | + | | 2v2 Fortress Conquering |
| + | | (conquerable, unconquerable) | ||
| unconquerable | | unconquerable | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | scoring distribution (10/0, 6/4) | + | | scoring distribution |
| + | | (10/0, 6/4) | ||
| 6/4 | | 6/4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | winzone / deathzone (yes, no, expanding, when?) | + | | winzone / deathzone |
| + | | (yes, no, expanding, when?) | ||
| no | | no | ||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="9" | [http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtopic.php?p=206556#p206556 L-21] | | rowspan="9" | [http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtopic.php?p=206556#p206556 L-21] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | team_max_players (6v6, 7v7, 8v8) | + | | team_max_players |
| + | | (6v6, 7v7, 8v8) | ||
| 6v6 | | 6v6 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | score_hole (1 point, 0 points) | + | | score_hole |
| + | | (1 point, 0 points) | ||
| 0 points | | 0 points | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | scoring distribution (10/0, 6/4) | + | | scoring distribution |
| + | | (10/0, 6/4) | ||
| 6/4 | | 6/4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | brackets / team placement (random, seeded) | + | | brackets / team placement |
| + | | (random, seeded) | ||
| random | | random | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | servers (random, balance of Euro/American) | + | | servers |
| + | | (random, balance of Euro/American) | ||
| balanced | | balanced | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | rotate finals between US/EU servers (yes, no) | + | | rotate finals between US/EU servers |
| + | | (yes, no) | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | coordinated server names (yes, no) | + | | coordinated server names |
| + | | (yes, no) | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | team must play with the names listed on the Challenge Board (yes, no) | + | | team must play with the names listed on the Challenge Board |
| + | | (yes, no) | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 5 July 2010
Ladle Voting
The decision-making process for Ladle-related issues was sketchy at best before the voting system was in place. Previously, community members might make a forum poll or some complaint thread, and people would argue a point. Very little was ever accomplished and every change was a challenge to authority of sorts.
At one point, people began to question the nature of the Ladle rules themselves and the authority for which they had been created. [1] It was clear something needed to be done. By February 2009, just about everything related to the Ladle was in question again. A discussion of rules broke out, but this time it was about not just what rules we should have, but how to decide on them as a community.[2] Lackadaisical pointed out a vote from Ladle-16 where the teams successfully decided on settings.[3] Eventually it was decided to try out a quarterly voting schedule using the previous method from Ladle-16. The first quarterly vote coincided with Ladle-21 and has been used rather consistently, with great success. [4]
The process is simple. Every third Ladle, a discussion thread is created to talk about Ladle issues. Ideas are flushed out, argued, and generally put through the ringer. One week before the Ladle sign-ups close, a voting thread is created. The thread contains the choices for the teams to vote on. Only teams signed up can vote, one vote per team (if you have a large clan with 2 teams, that means 2 votes). Voting closes when sign-ups close.
Past Votes
| Ladle | Issue | Choices | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| L-16 | score_hole | (1 point, 0 points) | 0 points |
| 2v2 Fortress Conquering | (conquerable, unconquerable) | unconquerable | |
| scoring distribution | (10/0, 6/4) | 6/4 | |
| winzone / deathzone | (yes, no, expanding, when?) | no | |
| L-21 | |||
| team_max_players | (6v6, 7v7, 8v8) | 6v6 | |
| score_hole | (1 point, 0 points) | 0 points | |
| scoring distribution | (10/0, 6/4) | 6/4 | |
| brackets / team placement | (random, seeded) | random | |
| servers | (random, balance of Euro/American) | balanced | |
| rotate finals between US/EU servers | (yes, no) | yes | |
| coordinated server names | (yes, no) | yes | |
| team must play with the names listed on the Challenge Board | (yes, no) | yes |
