Difference between revisions of "2010 Q1 Dev Meeting"
From Armagetron
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#Armagetron | http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#Armagetron | ||
+ | |||
+ | Log: http://havoc.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~p4/logs/armagetron/show.php?log=%23armagetron.2010-01-10.log | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
− | |||
− | |||
=== Community === | === Community === | ||
*Forum moderation | *Forum moderation | ||
+ | *Give Lackadaisical access to website | ||
=== Resource Repository === | === Resource Repository === | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
*Restoring the central community repository | *Restoring the central community repository | ||
**Hosting | **Hosting | ||
− | ***Is Dreamhost usable? | + | ***Is Dreamhost usable? '''No, can't run rsyncd''' |
**Accounts | **Accounts | ||
***Username or global-ID? | ***Username or global-ID? | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
=== Merging Sty/CT === | === Merging Sty/CT === | ||
− | *If the 0.2.8 branches are wanted, maybe they should be merged and become 0.2.9? | + | *If the 0.2.8 branches are wanted, maybe they should be merged and become 0.2.9? '''z-man sez NO''' |
*Merging trunk development | *Merging trunk development | ||
**Per-feature branch theory | **Per-feature branch theory | ||
Line 57: | Line 58: | ||
=== Stabilisation of trunk after 0.2.8.3 === | === Stabilisation of trunk after 0.2.8.3 === | ||
*Trunk | *Trunk | ||
− | **Quite unstable yet, not good for tournament servers. -- Branch 0.4? | + | **Quite unstable yet, not good for tournament servers. -- Branch 0.4? '''Yes''' |
− | **Authentication threading not working, drop zthreads and use boost threads as we already use boost ? | + | **Authentication threading not working, drop zthreads and use boost threads as we already use boost ? '''Yes, for 0.4''' |
**New features | **New features | ||
***Referee votes | ***Referee votes | ||
*Windows 7 | *Windows 7 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Development]] |
Latest revision as of 20:16, 22 August 2021
http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=19861
Date and Time
On Sunday 10th, January 2010, a bit before the ladle, around 18 GMT
Where
IRC Channel #armagetron
on irc.freenode.net
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#Armagetron
Log: http://havoc.ift.uni.wroc.pl/~p4/logs/armagetron/show.php?log=%23armagetron.2010-01-10.log
Agenda
Community
- Forum moderation
- Give Lackadaisical access to website
Resource Repository
- Splintered community repositories popping up
- Restoring the central community repository
- Hosting
- Is Dreamhost usable? No, can't run rsyncd
- Accounts
- Username or global-ID?
- Management
- Non-developers?
- Third party dtd's?
- Hosting
Merging Sty/CT
- If the 0.2.8 branches are wanted, maybe they should be merged and become 0.2.9? z-man sez NO
- Merging trunk development
- Per-feature branch theory
- Trigger protocol
- Need a way to let servers define new controls
Future Direction
- Console/phone platform support
- OpenGL ES
- GPL exceptions?
- Scripting
- Python scripting fork (removes Ruby "support")
- Feature requests via bug tracker?
- CMake and other stagnant branches
User Experience
- Menus
- Item Reorganisation
- Implementation Details, better kept for future dev-only discussion
- Use hooks to generate menus on the fly
- eEvent branch uses boost::signals, finalise and use that?
- Add menu entries statically, but better
- Use hooks to generate menus on the fly
- Implementation Details, better kept for future dev-only discussion
- Better Look
- Use cockpit code?
- glowing
- textures/models
- Item Reorganisation
Stabilisation of trunk after 0.2.8.3
- Trunk
- Quite unstable yet, not good for tournament servers. -- Branch 0.4? Yes
- Authentication threading not working, drop zthreads and use boost threads as we already use boost ? Yes, for 0.4
- New features
- Referee votes
- Windows 7