Difference between revisions of "2010 Q1 Dev Meeting"
From Armagetron
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
*Merging trunk development | *Merging trunk development | ||
**Per-feature branch theory | **Per-feature branch theory | ||
+ | *Trigger protocol | ||
+ | **Need a way to let servers define new controls | ||
+ | **5 'commands' per control: begin <action>, end <action>, begin rapidfire <action> [charge duration], end rapidfire <action>, singlefire <action> [charge duration] | ||
=== Future Direction === | === Future Direction === |
Revision as of 17:05, 8 January 2010
http://forums3.armagetronad.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=19861
Date and Time
On Sunday 10th, January 2010, a bit before the ladle, around 18 GMT
Where
IRC Channel #armagetron
on irc.freenode.net
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#Armagetron
Agenda
Edit as desired...
Community
- Forum moderation
Resource Repository
- Splintered community repositories popping up
- Restoring the central community repository
- Hosting
- Is Dreamhost usable?
- Accounts
- Username or global-ID?
- Management
- Non-developers?
- Third party dtd's?
- Hosting
Merging Sty/CT
- If the 0.2.8 branches are wanted, maybe they should be merged and become 0.2.9?
- Merging trunk development
- Per-feature branch theory
- Trigger protocol
- Need a way to let servers define new controls
- 5 'commands' per control: begin <action>, end <action>, begin rapidfire <action> [charge duration], end rapidfire <action>, singlefire <action> [charge duration]
Future Direction
- Console/phone platform support
- OpenGL ES
- GPL exceptions?
- Scripting
- Python scripting fork (removes Ruby "support")
- Feature requests via bug tracker?