Difference between revisions of "Talk:THE SPOON"

From Armagetron
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
pez
 
pez
  
−
*I noticed there is a vacant spot ... e.g. Something Something (aka. ??) has no opponent (first column of the table).
+
* About the "spoon playoffs":
−
(See end of page http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php/Sandbox)
+
# Spoon Players should nominate judges (for match rescheduling or something like that - in case "america to europe" pings are all 400+ or some other major problem.
 +
# A team with missing players can "give up" or choose to play with less players than the other team.
 +
# A team should only be allowed to use the players written on the playoff rooster.  
 +
:OR
 +
:To prevent a player (e.g. "zop") from playing for multiple teams, just bind him to the first team he plays for - afterwards he is on that team.
  
−
So ?? is pretty strong and I thought it might be worthwhile to get some other good players and challenge ??. I know I'm part of ?? but lackadaisical is fine with me leaving and providing another challenger for ??. This is a stupid situation as this team would enter pretty late and
+
--[[User:Joda|Joda]] 10:57, 20 April 2006 (CDT)[edit: removed New Team Discussion]
−
I hope ppl aren't offended. We're positive to have lost all matches in the seed round of course. (and also it's likely that the "new team" is elimated by ??).
 
−
I'd prefer to stay on ?? until this is decided.
 
  
−
Current interested players:
+
:I'd vote for the "second third option" since it makes more sense to me. --[[User:Wrtlprnft|Wrtlprnft]] 13:22, 18 April 2006 (CDT)
−
  - emlock
 
−
  - joda.bot
 
−
  - ~*SP*~om3ga
 
−
  - junglist
 
  
−
Hoping for:
+
:Should we increase/decrease the number of minimum required players ? To 8 vs 8 for playoffs makes sense. --[[User:Joda|Joda]] 10:59, 20 April 2006 (CDT)
−
  - zop (unlikely)
 
−
  - leeroy jenkins?
 
−
  - anyone else (be aware ?? won't be easy)
 
−
 
 
−
About the "spoon playoffs":
 
−
1) Spoon Players should nominate judges (for match rescheduling or something like that - in case "america to europe" pings are all 400+ or
 
−
some other major problem.
 
−
2) A team with missing players can "give up" or choose to play with less players than the other team.
 
−
3) A team should only be allowed to use the players written on the playoff rooster.
 
−
OR
 
−
3) To prevent a player (e.g. "zop") from playing for multiple teams, just bind him to the first team he plays for - afterwards he is on that team.
 
−
 
 
−
Also in the wiki @:
 
−
http://wiki.armagetronad.net/index.php/THE_SPOON
 
−
 
 
−
joda
 

Latest revision as of 11:59, 20 April 2006

  • no discussion yet?

anyway, i really looking forward to it and good luck all

pez

  • About the "spoon playoffs":
  1. Spoon Players should nominate judges (for match rescheduling or something like that - in case "america to europe" pings are all 400+ or some other major problem.
  2. A team with missing players can "give up" or choose to play with less players than the other team.
  3. A team should only be allowed to use the players written on the playoff rooster.
OR
To prevent a player (e.g. "zop") from playing for multiple teams, just bind him to the first team he plays for - afterwards he is on that team.

--Joda 10:57, 20 April 2006 (CDT)[edit: removed New Team Discussion]

I'd vote for the "second third option" since it makes more sense to me. --Wrtlprnft 13:22, 18 April 2006 (CDT)
Should we increase/decrease the number of minimum required players ? To 8 vs 8 for playoffs makes sense. --Joda 10:59, 20 April 2006 (CDT)
Retrieved from "http://wiki.armagetronad.org/index.php?title=Talk:THE_SPOON&oldid=3985"