Difference between revisions of "Talk:THE SPOON"

Latest revision as of 11:59, 20 April 2006

anyway, i really looking forward to it and good luck all

pez

Spoon Players should nominate judges (for match rescheduling or something like that - in case "america to europe" pings are all 400+ or some other major problem.
A team with missing players can "give up" or choose to play with less players than the other team.
A team should only be allowed to use the players written on the playoff rooster.

OR

To prevent a player (e.g. "zop") from playing for multiple teams, just bind him to the first team he plays for - afterwards he is on that team.

--Joda 10:57, 20 April 2006 (CDT)[edit: removed New Team Discussion]

I'd vote for the "second third option" since it makes more sense to me. --Wrtlprnft 13:22, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

Should we increase/decrease the number of minimum required players ? To 8 vs 8 for playoffs makes sense. --Joda 10:59, 20 April 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:57, 20 April 2006 (view source) Joda (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 11:59, 20 April 2006 (view source) Joda (talk \| contribs)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:I'd vote for the "second third option" since it makes more sense to me. --[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 13:22, 18 April 2006 (CDT)		:I'd vote for the "second third option" since it makes more sense to me. --[[User:Wrtlprnft\|Wrtlprnft]] 13:22, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

−	~~Just testing~~ the ~~wiki, please ignore me~~. --[[User:~~Lucifer~~\|~~Lucifer~~]] 19:22, 18 April 2006 (CDT)	+	:Should we increase/decrease the number of minimum required players ? To 8 vs 8 for playoffs makes sense. --[[User:Joda\|Joda]] 10:59, 20 April 2006 (CDT)